North-Korea shoots South-Korea. 120 heavy artillery projectiles banged supposedly and four men died. This much were the news shortly. One day after the zionist incitement begins against North-Korea. Nobody is interested in the real facts. The news is not about that this year South-Korea kept 11 field exercises with the USA but North-Korea kept only one common practice with the Russian and Chinese fleet.
It is craziness to compare the northern and the southern army, because North-Korea practices with the traditional Soviet combined arms sample, but South-Korea prefer the rapid reaction military force. There are so many example that it is possible to use both well. The storming of Iraq is the example of the rapid reaction war because the country managed to occupy under a couple of weeks (it is not significant now that it has been under embargo in the last 10 years, or what is going on now, just the fall of the government is interesting now). The distinguished example of the Soviet sample is the Georgian-Russian conflict. Russian military force with an alike staff number destroyed the Georgian army with more modern equipment and it took only 4 days. So it is possible to use both, and both may be expedient.
You may ask where is the rub then?
The Russians realized it already, that the modern guerilla warfare (asymmetric war) can cause huge losses, because the little guerilla army is able to hold down a huge army and despite the military occupation of the areas the stabilizing is practically impossible. Rapid reaction USA warfare serves a principle that wishes to hold the occupied areas at all costs however (area robber warfare).
Baghdad townscapes… but Kabul does not look better either…
Accordingly, the countries using the older warfare, such as Russia realized, that the only way to conquer a country is to build excellent political relation after the military occupation, and then brandish money back in the recent territory (Chechen solution). Contrarily, the dieing capitalist order cannot achieve this even with its new warfare, since for the maintenance of its power it needs (must!) to exploit the territories farthing. Afghanistan is an example, where to keep their presence up, they must spend all the exploitable money for the maintenance of their own army and the armies of the warlords. Now then, their presence remains nothing more than a political question, and can only be maintained until the people of the occupied country are willing to pay the tax for it. If they turn out to be grousing, the outcome of the war is doubtful, since in an asymmetric war the victory of the guerillas depends on the support of the folk, so the intruders actually throws them the chance. Most of the USA’s wars after the Second World War came off likely; in truth it has won no wars.
Pictures from Groznij… it looks like this today
However, we can still engage predictions between the two armies, or meditate on possibilities.
The southern forces are equal to the half of the northern forces, equipped with excellent clothing, techniques and technologies. It has great advantages against the northern forces in direct, open clashes. Their tanks can prevail from a greater distance. The situation is the same viewing its gunnery, radars, reconnaissance satellites, etc. The night vision goggles and thermal imagers are common tackles amongst the infantry, which means incredible advantage. But their men are much worse, their mentality is being infected by the democratic filth, and because they have no idea what would they become after a political change: heroes, or criminals. They never trust their own leaders.
North-Korea on a parade. A300 locators and the containers of S300
The northern warfare is much less evolved in fact. But it possesses an incredible strike force, its most important cities, forces and techniques are protected by S-300 air protection, which offers reliable defense, the technical disadvantages are replaced by the strike force’s greatness and the harsh discipline, typical to the old warfare. Since it received the guerilla techniques from a much more positive side (from the triumphants over the USA), the North trained 120.000 men for this kind of warfare. With this it can perform such actions which can fundamentally concuss the forces of South, and the USA. And the northern soldiers are fanatics, since they know it well that their leadership will hold on to them. Finally, let an important argument follow. North-Korea will use their nuclear weapons without questioning, they declared they would use it even on their own territory. A nuclear launch inflicted on a capital city or main economic region will liquidate the southern forces right away. A counterstrike from the USA is highly improbable, if not impossible, since it would mean world war. USA is only an ally, as are China, and Russia as well.
North-Korea armament – atomic charge leaving suitable rocket is at his disposal
But South-Korea is still messing around. Let’s think about it: maybe North would be drove to the edge of annihilation, and from the fate of Saddam it knows what awaits, it would certainly use its nuclear missiles. But if so, then what is the point of this whole thing?
If you would ask, who would win, the technical superiority would grant south the chance to win fast and make north lose plenty of their soldiers. But the long-term victory of south and the USA can be excluded. It is also important, that north would most probably receive newer technologies from Moscow and Peking, maybe only for testing as soon as the old ones are destroyed. It is not an easy question, since it can literally break the USA’s backbone if it loses some of its carriers or some mass destructive weapons kill ten thousands of its soldiers. With this, the USA’s role as the world’s gendarme is over, together with its remaining authority.
Even so, the USA requires this political tension. Joining this maneuver didn’t happen by coincidence, even though the northern resistance was certain, since it has not forgiven the southern ships’ constant violation of the borders. The USA needs this, for several reasons. It is in the need to diverse the attention of the public opinion from the upcoming defeat in Afghanistan, the status in Iraq and finally from Israel. On the other hand the USA’s domestic political situation has never been worse than now. So they need to produce victory after the years of failing, or it is done for them. And nowadays even tension counts as victory there.
The confiscation of North-Korea from a hungarist point of view: North-Korea is one of the Earth’s countries with pure morality. There is no Holocaust-religion, no fornication parade, embryo murdering, exploiting, drugs and prostitution, and their leaders are communists of that kind who doesn’t care anything about the “jewish apostles”. The whole society is militarily organized, with a perfect community spirit. Everything else is immaterial.
István Gyártó – Jövőnk.info
Translated by Aron Fenyvesi
